Products related to Debate:
-
Innovation in Music: Technology and Creativity
Innovation in Music: Technology and Creativity is a groundbreaking collection bringing together contributions from instructors, researchers, and professionals.Split into two sections, covering composition and performance, and technology and innovation, this volume offers truly international perspectives on ever-evolving practices. Including chapters on audience interaction, dynamic music methods, AI, and live electronic performances, this is recommended reading for professionals, students, and researchers looking for global insights into the fields of music production, music business, and music technology.
Price: 53.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
The Habermas-Luhmann Debate
Fifty years ago, the two leading German philosophers and sociologists since the Second World War, Jürgen Habermas and Niklas Luhmann, embarked on a sweeping and contentious debate that would continue for decades.Their coauthored 1971 book Theory of Society or Social Technology laid out their opposing positions on meaning, communication, consensus, and dissent—and ultimately the foundations of modern social thought.Habermas and Luhmann would elaborate their disagreement in the years to come in a controversy whose aftershocks divided social theorists by presenting what appeared to be two fundamentally divergent views of the nature of society and what systems theory was capable of explaining. This is the first book in English about one of the most important conflicts in social theory today.Gorm Harste analyzes the Habermas-Luhmann debate from its inception through Habermas’s most recent works, exploring issues such as methodology, ideology, truth, history, and politics.He contextualizes their positions in terms of how each grappled with the legacy of Nazism and sought to provide grounding for an antitotalitarian politics.Harste follows the evolution of the debate, as the fundamental dispute over the normative and practical desirability of agreement and disagreement came to touch upon political questions including the rule of law, the separation of powers, human rights, individualization, and secularization.Ultimately, Harste emphasizes the convergence between Habermas and Luhmann—and the pressing need for social theorists to further unite these two formative accounts of contemporary society.
Price: 30.00 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
American Empire : A Debate
In this short, accessible book Layne and Thayer argue the merits and demerits of an American empire.With few, if any, rivals to its supremacy, the United States has made an explicit commitment to maintaining and advancing its primacy in the world.But what exactly are the benefits of American hegemony and what are the costs and drawbacks for this fledgling empire?After making their best cases for and against an American empire, subsequent chapters allow both authors to respond to the major arguments presented by their opponents and present their own counter arguments.
Price: 43.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Pioneering Progress : American Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy
Price: 48.00 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £
-
What is a suitable debate topic for a debate?
A suitable debate topic should be relevant, thought-provoking, and have two clear opposing sides. It should be something that can be argued from different perspectives and allow for a meaningful exchange of ideas. Additionally, the topic should be of interest to the audience and have real-world implications. Examples of suitable debate topics could include: "Should the voting age be lowered to 16?" or "Is social media more harmful than beneficial to society?"
-
How can I debate effectively?
To debate effectively, it is important to thoroughly research and understand the topic you are debating. Make sure to listen actively to your opponent's arguments and respond thoughtfully with evidence and logic. Stay calm and composed, avoid personal attacks, and focus on the substance of the arguments being presented. Practice good communication skills, such as clear articulation and persuasive language, to effectively convey your points.
-
Do you need a debate?
Whether or not a debate is needed depends on the specific situation and the goals of the discussion. Debates can be useful for exploring different perspectives, challenging assumptions, and reaching a deeper understanding of complex issues. However, they can also be unproductive if the goal is simply to win an argument rather than seek common ground or find solutions. Ultimately, the decision to have a debate should be based on whether it will help achieve the desired outcome and promote constructive dialogue.
-
Is the goat debate over?
The goat debate is unlikely to ever be fully resolved, as it is subjective and based on individual opinions. While some may argue that certain players are the greatest of all time in their respective sports, others may have different criteria and opinions. The debate will likely continue as long as sports are played and new athletes emerge, each with their own accomplishments and impact on their respective sports.
Similar search terms for Debate:
-
What is Consciousness? : A Debate
What is consciousness and why is it so philosophically and scientifically puzzling?For many years philosophers approached this question assuming a standard physicalist framework on which consciousness can be explained by contemporary physics, biology, neuroscience, and cognitive science.This book is a debate between two philosophers who are united in their rejection of this kind of "standard" physicalism - but who differ sharply in what lesson to draw from this.Amy Kind defends dualism 2.0, a thoroughly modern version of dualism (the theory that there are two fundamentally different kinds of things in the world: those that are physical and those that are mental) decoupled from any religious or non-scientific connotations.Daniel Stoljar defends non-standard physicalism, a kind of physicalism different from both the standard version and dualism 2.0.The book presents a cutting-edge assessment of the philosophy of consciousness and provides a glimpse at what the future study of this area might bring. Key FeaturesOutlines the different things people mean by "consciousness" and provides an account of what consciousness isReviews the key arguments for thinking that consciousness is incompatible with physicalismExplores and provides a defense of contrasting responses to those arguments, with a special focus on responses that reject the standard physicalist frameworkProvides an account of the basic aims of the science of consciousnessWritten in a lively and accessibly styleIncludes a comprehensive glossary
Price: 31.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Does Tomorrow Exist? : A Debate
This book takes up the question of whether past and future events exist.Two very different views are explored. According to one of these views (presentism), advanced by Nikk Effingham, the present is special.Effingham argues that only present things exist, but which things those are changes as time passes.Given presentism, although there once existed dinosaurs, they exist no more, and although you and I exist, at some time in the future we will come to exist no more.According to the alternative view (eternalism), advanced by Kristie Miller, our world is a giant four-dimensional block of spacetime in which all things, past, present, and future, exist.On this view, dinosaurs exist, it is just that they are not located at the current time.The book considers arguments for and against presentism and eternalism, including arguments that appeal to our best science, to the way the world seems to us to be in our experiences of time, change, and freedom, and to how to make sense of ordinary claims about the past.Key Features:Offers an accessible introduction to the philosophy of temporal ontologyCaptures the process of philosophical debate, giving readers an insight into the craft of philosophyEngages with and clearly explains state-of-the-art and cutting-edge research
Price: 27.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Standard English : The Widening Debate
Standard English draws together the leading international scholars in the field, who confront the debates surrounding 'Standard English', grammar and correctness head-on. These debates are as intense today as ever and extend far beyond an academic context.Current debates about the teaching of English in the school curriculum and concerns about declining standards of English are placed in a historical, social and international context.Standard English:* explores the definitions of 'Standard English', with particular attention to distinctions between spoken and written English* traces the idea of 'Standard English' from its roots in the late seventeenth century through to the present day. This is an accessible, seminal work which clarifies an increasingly confused topic.It includes contributions from: Ronald Carter, Jenny Cheshire, Tony Crowley, James Milroy, Lesley Milroy and Peter Trudgill.
Price: 47.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Should Wealth Be Redistributed? : A Debate
A central contested issue in contemporary economics and political philosophy is whether governments should redistribute wealth.In this book, a philosopher and an economist debate this question.James Otteson argues that respect for individual persons requires that the government should usually not alter the results of free exchanges, and so redistribution is usually wrong.Steven McMullen argues that governments should substantially redistribute wealth in order to ensure that all have a minimal opportunity to participate in economic life.Over the course of the exchange, the authors investigate a number of important questions.Is redistribution properly a question of justice, and what is the appropriate standard?Has the welfare state been effective at fighting poverty?Can we expect government intervention in the economy to be helpful or counterproductive?Are our obligations to help the poor best met through government action, or through private philanthropy and individual charity?The book features clear statements of each argument, responses to counterarguments, in-text definitions, a glossary of key terms, and section summaries.Scholars and students alike will find it easy to follow the debate and learn the key concepts from philosophy, politics, and economics necessary to understand each position. Key Features: Offers clear arguments written to be accessible to readers and students without a deep background in economics, philosophy, or political theory. Fosters a deep exchange of ideas with responses from each author to the main arguments. Provides in-text definitions and a glossary with definitions of key terms. Includes section summaries that give an overview of the main arguments and a comprehensive bibliography for further reading.
Price: 27.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £
-
Does this German debate fit?
Yes, this German debate fits the context of discussing the impact of social media on society. The debate focuses on the spread of misinformation and hate speech online, which are key issues related to social media's influence. By examining the role of platforms like Facebook and Twitter in shaping public discourse and behavior, the debate sheds light on the broader implications of digital communication in today's interconnected world.
-
What is a contra debate?
A contra debate is a type of debate where one side argues against a given proposition or resolution. In a contra debate, the opposing team presents arguments that challenge the validity or soundness of the proposition being debated. This type of debate requires participants to critically analyze the topic and provide evidence and reasoning to support their position against the motion. Contra debates can be a valuable exercise in developing critical thinking skills and the ability to argue from multiple perspectives.
-
How does a debate proceed?
A debate typically proceeds with each side presenting their arguments and supporting evidence. The participants take turns speaking, with each side having the opportunity to respond to the other's points. The debate may be moderated by a neutral party to ensure that each side has a fair chance to present their case. At the end of the debate, there may be a closing statement or summary from each side before a decision or conclusion is reached.
-
How can I debate well?
To debate well, it is important to thoroughly research and understand the topic you are debating. Develop strong arguments supported by evidence and examples to back up your points. Listen actively to your opponent's arguments and respond thoughtfully, rather than just trying to win the debate. Practice good communication skills, such as speaking clearly and confidently, and be respectful towards others' viewpoints even if you disagree with them.
* All prices are inclusive of VAT and, if applicable, plus shipping costs. The offer information is based on the details provided by the respective shop and is updated through automated processes. Real-time updates do not occur, so deviations can occur in individual cases.